Business

Why we do more than the regional standard (and what it costs)

26% of French small businesses and SMEs protect their remote access with a second factor, 16% have a detection system, 31% an incident procedure. In Alsace, the Region, the European Collectivity of Alsace and a Strasbourg hospital group have already been hit. The market standard for hosting and managed services does not match the threat of 2026. Here is what we do on top, why, and what it really costs.

In front of a skyline of half-timbered houses and a cathedral spire, a hut with an open padlock facing a small fortified building with a tower and a moat, under a storm cloud
Contents (6 sections)
  1. Where French SMEs really stand
  2. Alsace is not spared, it is on record
  3. Line by line: what we do on top
  4. Why, if nobody requires it?
  5. What it costs, honestly
  6. Sources

A prospective client put the question to us bluntly: “You are more expensive than the agency next door for hosting the same site, why?”. The honest answer takes an article. Not because the agency next door does poor work: the market standard for SME hosting and managed services is what it is, and it was set at a time when attackers were not agents. Here are the figures, the local precedents, and line by line what we do differently.

Where French SMEs really stand #

The 2025 barometer from Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr, the French government’s cybercrime assistance service, carried out by OpinionWay among 588 companies with fewer than 250 employees, leaves no room for doubt. 26% use two-factor authentication to connect remotely to the company network. 16% have an attack detection system. 31% have an incident response procedure, and nearly half admit they are not prepared. 78% report having “backups”, without anyone knowing where they are or whether they have ever been restored. And yet 44% feel highly exposed: the awareness is there, the tooling is not. On the ANSSI side, the 2025 threat overview ranks small businesses, SMEs and mid-sized companies as the leading category of ransomware victims, with nearly half of the compromises known to the agency.

Alsace is not spared, it is on record #

  • 14 February 2020, Grand Est Region. Ransomware paralysed the workstations of 7,500 staff in Lorraine, Champagne-Ardenne and Strasbourg for more than a week.
  • September 2022, European Collectivity of Alsace. A legitimate account hijacked in early September, a malicious loader, then Cobalt Strike to map the network. Detected on 29 September just as the attack tool was being deployed, according to the CISO: around a hundred machines out of 6,500, and a five-day IT shutdown decided in order to investigate. What saved the authority was detection, exactly what 84% of SMEs do not have.
  • Night of 6 to 7 September 2023, Strasbourg. The Fondation Vincent de Paul, some thirty healthcare, childcare and elderly care facilities, saw its information system knocked out; Strasbourg’s emergency departments absorbed the overflow.
  • March 2025. “Strasbourg is attacked every week”, sums up the city’s deputy mayor in charge of technology, phishing and denial of service included. The same article notes that over seven city council meetings, more than a hundred hours of debate, less than ten minutes were spent on cybersecurity.

These organisations have IT departments, budgets and providers. A twenty-person SME with a brochure website, a business tool and a mailbox on a shared hosting plan has none of that, and it is on the same map, at the same distance from the same attackers.

On the left, five figures from the 2025 Cybermalveillance barometer (26% two-factor authentication, 16% detection, 31% incident procedure, 78% backups, 44% highly exposed); on the right, an eight-row table comparing the usual hosting and managed services offering with what Sanfytech applies: hosting, backups, admin access, updates, logs, firewall, incidents, data
“Usual offering” describes a market standard, not a competitor. Each row on the right links to an article on this blog showing how it is actually implemented.

Line by line: what we do on top #

  • One isolated machine per site or application. No shared hosting where a compromised neighbour becomes your problem: each client lives in its own machine, on a segmented network behind a single entry point, on dedicated servers in France.
  • Backups out of reach. The 3-2-1 rule with an immutable copy on a separate backup server, tested restores, and probes that check every night that the backup really took place. Ransomware that encrypts the server does not encrypt the copy.
  • Administrator access through a bastion. Named accounts, SSO with a second factor, keys only, and every session recorded and replayable. No machine accepts a password any more. We describe this migration on 18 September, and the move from a cloud SSH client to a self-hosted console on the 16th.
  • Patches decided, not endured. A live inventory of all versions, daily CVE monitoring, and weekly patching done while watching, the same day for an exposed critical flaw. Because the exploitation window is counted in hours.
  • Centralised logs and detection. A SIEM that keeps twelve months of events away from the machines, monitors SSH keys across the whole fleet in real time and alerts above a threshold. It is what saved the European Collectivity of Alsace, and what 84% of SMEs do not have. Full article on 21 September.
  • Firewall checked from outside. Not “enabled in the interface”: tested from a third-party machine, with fail2ban and CrowdSec in front of exposed services.
  • Self-audit and frameworks. The 42 ANSSI hygiene measures run against our own infrastructure, without going easy on ourselves, and a reading of the 20 objectives of the NIS2 framework, published on 23 September.

Why, if nobody requires it? #

Three reasons, in order. The threat has changed speed: what we describe in our two articles on offensive AI does not wait for SMEs to catch up with the standard. Regulation is coming: NIS2 will turn those of our clients who are concerned into entities that must answer for their providers, and we want to be the answer, not the problem. And it is our job: a hosting provider that loses a client’s data gets no second chance, whatever the contract says.

What it costs, honestly #

It is not the cheapest hosting in the region, and it never will be: a dedicated machine costs more than a folder on a shared server, and managed services that pay attention cost more than a script that updates things at night. But most of the difference is not hardware, it is doctrine and tooling, and the tooling is shared across the whole fleet: the bastion, the SIEM, the monitoring and the backups serve all clients at once. In practice, the gap with a usual offering is measured in tens of euros a month for a website, not hundreds. Set against a local authority’s five days of downtime or a hospital group’s lost night, the question of price takes on a different nature.

If you want to compare, point by point, what your current provider puts against each row of the table above, we will gladly do it, with no commitment, with the evidence on our side: that is the content of our managed services and our sovereign hosting. Let us talk.

Sources #

About
01/Read nextThree articles

Related articles

Method

93% of our code was never reviewed. We closed the door.

Over ninety days, 855 commits reached the main branch without going through a merge request, against 63 that did. And that branch triggers the release to production. Measurement, decision, and the four pitfalls we hit while closing the door.

continuous integrationcode review
Security

A stale lock file is a scan that lies

Dependency lock files are the source of truth for security scans. When a build pipeline quietly rewrites them instead of failing, the scan reads the wrong versions and returns a reassuring verdict. How we found out, and what we changed.

dependenciessoftware supply chain
Security

446 vulnerabilities, then zero: what an honest inventory changes

Each machine scanned its own images, and nobody could see the fleet. By centralising the analysis on the real inventory (111 unique images instead of 25 local databases), the counter went from 446 to 0 in one evening. The story of a measurement project, not a fixing one.

vulnerabilitiescontainers

What next

Managed services that go beyond the standard?

What we do, line by line, and what it costs. First conversation free.

Discuss your project

Reply within 24 working hours, from one of the two founders. Or by phone: +33 7 59 96 14 99.